Eric is a sophomore from Cary, Illinois studying Political Science and Economics. He is interested in the intersection between politics, economics, psychology, and history. During the summer, Eric spends his time running his beekeeping business, and in his free time, Eric enjoys playing foosball, reading history, and vainly attempting to find things do around the suburbs.
Naveen Krishnan contributed to this article.
Several weeks ago, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor came to Vanderbilt to meet with students and faculty. Before her formal presentation at the Vanderbilt Law school, Justice Sotomayor met with various undergraduate students including correspondents from VPR, sharing her experiences and lessons she has learned throughout life.
When asked about her biggest professional failure thus far in her legal career by Naveen Krishnan, Justice Sotomayor revealed that she did not receive a return offer from the law firm that she interned with during a summer in law school. The experience marked a turning point in her life as she vowed to herself to never again come unprepared to any situation. Referring back to the general theme of the obstacles she overcame as a young professional, Justice Sotomayor discussed aspects of her upbringing.
When asked by Eric Asen about her rise to the highest court in the United States despite the challenging circumstances into which she was born, Justice Sotomayor described her academic experience as an undergraduate at Princeton. She highlighted that unlike her, many of her classmates all came from prep schools and were far more prepared upon entering school. Highlighting the initial academic struggles she experienced during her first semester, during each following semester at Princeton, her report card displayed an additional A until she was earning 4.0s every semester. The lesson she sought to impart was for people to make small goals and tackle them one step at a time.
During a discussion about the balance between objectivity and empathy in the law, her initial remark surprised many when she stated that she did not believe that the law is entirely black and white in the first place. Holding that it is difficult to definitively claim that law can truly be objective, Justice Sotomayor highlighted how books like Just Mercy have led her to be more cautious surrounding certain cases. In order to explain this concept further, she detailed a court case she had dealt with which involved a man who committed a crime while on parole. The man had stolen pipes from a building he thought to be abandoned in order to sell them for a return. Committing this crime while on parole, however, meant that he would be forced back to prison for life. In light of this reality, the criminal’s attorney came to Justice Sotomayor in tears and begged her to avoid this seemingly draconian response, since the criminal could not find any work because of his record and had stolen the pipes as to avoid reverting back to selling drugs for money. Justice Sotomayor pondered the facets of the case and determined that covering the costs of the robbery was better than sending the criminal back to prison indefinitely which would have ruined his life and cost far more than the robbery. She was able to work with the man and decided to give him another chance. Years later, the man came back to Justice Sotomayor in complete tears, as he told her that he had a steady job and a fiance. Through this story, Justice Sotomayor highlighted that the law is to be respected, but that there is a place to weigh the options in order to help lift people up.
In her departing words with the law students, undergraduates, and faculty present at the lecture, Justice Sotomayor stressed that above all students should demonstrate their passion in whatever career path they decide.
Photo Credit: Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor @ El Museo, El Museo del Barrio, © 2013 EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, licensed by CC BY 2.0