Vanderbilt's First and Only Nonpartisan Political Journal

Vanderbilt Political Review

Vanderbilt's First and Only Nonpartisan Political Journal

Vanderbilt Political Review

Vanderbilt's First and Only Nonpartisan Political Journal

Vanderbilt Political Review

SATIRE: The Dishonorable Treatment of the Honorable George Santos

SATIRE%3A+The+Dishonorable+Treatment+of+the+Honorable+George+Santos

The Honorable George Santos, M.D., D.O., Ph.D., D.V.M., O.D., D.B.A., Ed.D. D.M., D.S.W., D.F.A., J.D., Pharm.D., D.D.S., in a gross perversion of justice, was unfairly accused of a number of crimes including “stealing people’s identities, making charges on his donors’ credit cards without their authorization and lying to federal election officials,” and was made to stand before the House of Representatives. 

Fortunately, justice prevailed, and the reliable, sincere, and dependable representative prevailed in spite of the swamp’s efforts to expel him. The representative brilliantly noted that the last House congressman to be expelled was subsequently convicted of criminal charges. Obviously, removing George Santos for the “crimes” of which he was accused would set a dangerous precedent, in which the unfair, corrupt, and perverse justice system would pursue him as a normal American citizen, instead of as an honorable representative, by which he is rightfully situated above the law, even though he hasn’t violated it (and never would find it necessary to do so).

Apparently, George Santos will be judged by the House “Ethics” Committee, which consists of Representatives Michael Guest (R-MS), David P. Joyce (R-OH), John Rutherford (R-FL), Andrew Garbarino (R-NY), Michelle Fischbach (R-MN), Susan Wild (D-PA), Veronica Escobar (D-TX), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Deborah Ross (D-NC), and Glenn Ivey (D-MD). Upon close analysis of this list, I have uncovered that all of the “Ethics” committee members are in fact human beings. Furthermore, according to Colleen Hoover, bestselling author of It Ends with Us, “All humans make mistakes.” Given these two axiomatic statements of self-evident truth, we can establish an Aristotelian syllogism. As the committee members are humans, they make mistakes. It therefore makes little sense to subject an honorable, honest man to the subjective assessment of disgustingly error-prone Homo sapiens

As a practicing Catholic and upstanding “Jew-ish” man, Representative Santos should only be judged by God, the only perfect being. Unfortunately, a harrowing lack of deference to divine perfection has routinely characterized the legal trials and public scrutiny of honorable men, such as Richard Nixon, Andrew Johnson, Rick Renzi, Rod Blagojevich, and now, The Honorable George Santos. 

In his fight against the corrupt justice system, the Representative has aptly entered “not guilty” pleas to 23 charges. The historically-versed Representative was right to argue that his conviction or ousting would amount to the adoption of fascism throughout the entirety of the United States. Hopefully, justice and humanity will prevail in the witch hunt against The Honorable George Santos.

Image by US House of Representatives

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Matthew Moy, Contributor